Ranking the 2025 quarterback draft prospects in terms of their cost and fit with the Steelers
Stop me if you’ve heard this before: the Steelers need a quarterback.
Yes, they have Mason Rudolph. And Skylar Thompson. And maybe Aaron Rodgers. But we don’t yet know about Rodgers, and Rudolph and Thompson are an inadequate duo with whom to start a season.
Which brings us to the draft. There is speculation Pittsburgh will take a quarterback at some point. It could be in the first round; it could be in the seventh; it could be anywhere in between. On par with the theme at quarterback this off-season, no one seems to know.
If they do turn to the draft for help, they’ll have a host of players from which to choose. Many visited Pittsburgh in the pre-draft process, and the Steelers met with several others at their various Pro Days. It is said to be a thin draft for teams seeking immediate impact players at the position. But, there are several developmental prospects who, given time and the right landing spot, could become starters down the road.
Here, then, in ascending order, is my list of preferences should the Steelers draft a quarterback. This is not based on whom I consider the best quarterback in the draft, but rather whom I see as the best fit for the Steelers given the price they’d have to pay to select him.
6/5. Jaxson Dart (Mississippi); Tyler Shough (Louisville)
I put these two players in the same boat. They are both talented, they could both be NFL starters one day, but neither are worth the price tag it would cost the Steelers to select them.
Dart has a ton of ability, a huge arm, and a potentially bright NFL future. But he needs time to develop. Dart played in a simplified system at Old Miss that contained a lot of half-field reads and access throws. He’s going to need to learn the NFL game.
Shough, for all of his interesting traits (big arm, great off-platform ability, tremendous experience), is a gamble. For every Patrick Mahomes-like play Shough made in college, there seemed to be a corresponding one where he ran himself into a sack, or failed to read a defense properly, or threw a bad interception. His gunslinger mentality could put him at odds with the type of quarterback Mike Tomlin and Arthur Smith desire. Plus, for all his experience, Shough had only one year of high-level production.
Dart and Shough both seem to be rising up NFL draft boards. Dart was considered a late-second or early-third round pick when the process started. Now, he’s unlikely to make it past the top 35 overall. Shough was initially projected as a late-third or even fourth-round pick. There’s talk he too could be a top-35 selection. Both could end up becoming solid pros, but there are too many question marks to justify spending a high pick on either.
4. Shedeur Sanders (Colorado)
I like Sanders as a prospect more than many. I’m not scared of his personality, nor his father’s presence, nor any of the outside noise that accompanies him. Mike Tomlin has done a fantastic job managing big personalities in the past. I don’t see Sanders as a challenge in that regard.
What I do see is a quarterback who is a tough, accurate, can play from the pocket, and is a good leader. Sanders is mobile, but more in a Mahomes-sense where he can extend plays, and less like Lamar Jackson for whom you’d design a bunch of runs. He doesn’t have a big arm, but he makes up for it with sound fundamentals. On the downside, he often holds the ball too long, and he takes too many sacks. Still, his mobility, accuracy, and ball-handling skills would make him a good fit for Smith’s offense.
What I don’t like is the price tag. Sanders isn’t getting out of the first round, and it would be surprising if he’s on the board when the Steelers draft at #21. That means Pittsburgh would have to go up to get him. They don’t have a second-round pick as is, and going up would certainly cost them #21 plus their pick in Round Three. That’s too steep. If Sanders were a slam-dunk prospect guaranteed to be the team’s starter for the next decade, it would be worth it. But he’s not, which means the team should seek a different option.
3. Jalen Milroe (Alabama)
Milroe may be the ultimate “price is right” quarterback in this draft. He’s accepted an invitation to attend the draft in person, which could mean one of two things: either he’s excited to take part in that process, no matter where he’s selected; or, he may have some intel suggesting he’s coming off the board on Day One.
If the latter is true, could the Steelers be in the mix? Let’s hope not. Granted, Milroe is an incredible physical talent. At 6’2-230, he looks more like a linebacker than a quarterback. His arm strength is tremendous, his running ability is Jackson-esque, and he’s said to be a great teammate and leader. There is plenty to like in Milroe.
But he’s a project. To paraphrase one of the coaches I spoke with at the NFL Combine in February, if you put on Milroe’s ten best plays, he’s a Top 10 pick in this draft. If you put on his ten worst plays, you might not draft him at all. What does that mean? There are too many variables to risk a high draft pick on him. Yes, the physical gifts are exciting. But can he read an NFL defense? Will he be able to play from the pocket? Is he accurate enough?
For those reasons, Milroe is a Round Three option, not Round One. If he’s available there, I’d be excited for the Steelers to take him. But my guess is he’ll be long-gone by then.
2. Kyle McCord (Syracuse)
McCord is a third or fourth round prospect with little chance of being over-drafted. That makes him a perfect target for the Steelers.
Why? Because to have a shot at many of the players previously mentioned here, they’d have to use their top pick, or a trade into Round Two, to get them. That would be a reach. The Steelers have too many needs elsewhere to reach for a quarterback.
Round Three is the sweet spot, where McCord should be available. McCord fits Pittsburgh’s profile. He’s big (6’3-220), gets the ball out quickly, is an accurate passer, and thrives in the pocket. He’s not particularly athletic, and he won’t make many plays with his legs. But he’s mobile enough to run some of the bootleg and play-action concepts Arthur Smith favors. McCord needs time to develop his progression skills and to diagnose NFL coverages. But if you draft him in the third round, you’re not asking him to be an immediate contributor.
McCord visited the Steelers in the pre-draft process, so Pittsburgh has interest. As a developmental quarterback with a chance to become a starter someday, the price tag seems fair.
1. Will Howard (Ohio State)
Everything I just said about McCord goes double for Will Howard. In addition to the following:
Howard, at 6’4-235, is bigger and stronger than McCord. He’s also further along in his development as a passer. Howard’s ability to exploit the middle of the field was a big factor in Ohio State’s run to the national championship, and demonstrated his pocket presence and accuracy. He’s also a tremendous leader whose teammates held him in the highest regard. Listening to Buckeye receiver Emeka Egbuka rave about Howard at the Combine told me all I needed to know about Howard’s ability to command a football team.
Like McCord, Howard is not an elite athlete, but he’s mobile enough to escape the pocket. Ohio State even used him on designed runs in the red zone at times. Howard would also benefit from time to sit and develop, particularly when it comes to speeding up his processing. But that time should be granted.
The Steelers are not likely to find their next franchise quarterback in this draft, so they shouldn’t try to force the issue by over-drafting one. All things considered, if Will Howard is on the board when they pick in Round Three, he would provide the best value for what they need from this draft at the quarterback position.
For more of my work, follow me on X @KTSmithFFSN, and listen to my “Call Sheet Daily” podcast every Monday-Friday at 10 AM.
Evaluating QB’s is always difficult because they really aren’t playing the same game in college. Mahomes’ superpower is really his understanding of the game. He is so good at that and that is a hard thing measure at a combine. Zierlein comped Mahomes to Cutler. which physically makes sense but above the neck he is so much more. So, who is that guy in 2025? Probably nobody. They don’t come around often. Snaders is rated at 6.3 all the others are around 6.1 (good backup, potential starter).
If we look at Milroe we can see the physical potential but so many of his red flags are the above the neck football ones. By all accounts a super bright guy but that doesn’t always give you to football IQ to know where to go with the ball. I love the idea of a guy with huge traits coming in and blossoming, but we all know that is usually Andrew Richardson and rarely josh Allen.
Not a specific knock on the Steelers but does Mahomes become Mahomes in a different situation. Boss and QB have to mesh and the Boss needs to not freak out when QB is making mistakes. I think about how Bradshaw was treated, and it is a true testament to the real TB12’s resolve that he didn’t quit football. I think about young Ben and Cowher as well. Cowher gave him enough grow and let him make mistakes I am not Tomlin has that approach in him.
Poorly written all over the place response, eh?
When comparing McCord and Howard do you see a different ceiling? Is Howard seen as slightly ahead because of Jeremiah Smith, Emeka, Ebuka, and TreVeyon Henderson? I know McCord threw to very similar guys in 2023 but 2024 was a big difference in skill. Those tOSU guys always run so open across the field you don’t often get a good idea of the QB’s accuracy.
Outside of these 6, I like Henigan from Memphis. And he’s likely to cost us less than any of these guys.
If you removed the names, you would think that the evaluations of Kyle McCord and Will Howard applied to Mason Rudolph the year that he got drafted.
Rudolph was ranked slightly higher per his NFL.com draft Profile. Of course, his NFL comp was Christian Ponder so I am not sure what that means, but Mason would have been QB3 this year.
I think that’s pretty accurate. Rudolph played in an Air Raid scheme in college, while McCord and Howard did not, but the physical traits are pretty similar. The Steelers seem to like those types of QBs.
I worry when I see negatives like, lacks accuracy, below average arm strength, slow processor, selfish, doesn’t watch film, and bad mechanics. Players are very unlikely to fix these.
Negatives I’m not worried about are things like lacks athleticism, played in a simple system, holds the ball too long trying to extend plays, and didn’t face elite competition. These are manageable, and or not the QB’s fault.
I like to see good accuracy, smart / high football IQ, film junkie, great leader, elite accuracy, strong arm, and winner at every level, to name a few. So the question to me is, is there a guy in this draft that fits this category the Steelers can pick without a ridiculous overpay? Howard looks like the one that’s closest, but patience will be required. If, If he’s still there in the third, I would be very tempted to gamble that he’s still there in the 4th. If they can land him in the 4th that’s a major get for OK.
Agree 100%
I’m taking Howard should he be there. Name another College QB that will go into Great Detail about every play: What the call was, why it was called, protection call, pre snap to post snap read and why he made the throw he did. Wehn a QB is saying that and then goes out his way to actually do it how can you not take a guy like that?
I get what you’re saying, but I’d like to remind you of Mark Malone as a cautionary tale. He was all of that too, but he still couldn’t put it all together in the NFL.
Great but I wasn’t around for Malone, and this is the first time I’ve heard that about him.
I like Howard for some of the same reasons you do, but his ability to remember what happened on a play is not one of them. There is a huge difference between recalling what a play was and what happened after the fact, and being able to process all the variables pre and post snap realtime when it actually matters.
In what round do you want to take him? Zero chance I’m using my #1 pick for him.
Actually, that is exactly what Howard said. He said that any play folks pick he will break down the entire play from what the call was to what the D was showing. As far as Rd goes, at best Rd 3 and at worst Rd 4.
Hey we agree on the round!
I would like to present my mock draft I did using PFN’s Mock Draft Simulator. I am also including trades were proposed by other teams that I rejected. So let’s get on with it:
Rd 1:21, Traded to Jets with pick 156 to Jets for Picks: 42, 73 and 110.and there 2026 2nd Rd pick, Vikings offered the 24th and 26 3rd
Rd 2:42, Darius Alexander, DT-Toledo, 2 other offers came in: Vikings 2nd and a 26 3rd and NE offered picks 63,66 and a 26 5th, Seattle offered 50,52 and 26 2nd
Rd 3:73, Jacob Parrish, CB-KSU Indy offered picks 80 and 117
Rd 4:83, Traded pick with Pick 110 to Browns for picks 94 and 104. Jags offered 88 and 126 and Sea offered 92,125 and 26 2nd Rd pick
Rd 4:94, Was offered Dolphins picks of 98 and 155 and took it. SF offered picks 100 and 138.
Rd 4:98, Will Howard. Niners offered pick 100 and 26 5th Rd, Seattle offered 137 and a 3rd in 26
Rd 4:104 along with 123 and a 2026 7th sent to LVR for Picks 108 and 143 (This was my offer to Raiders) I then moved back with NO who offered the 112th and 184th picks, I then traded back again with Cincy for picks 119 and 153
Rd 4:119, Ollie Gordon (Best RB available at that point)
Rd 5:143, Dallas offered the 149th and 217th picks and I accepted
Rd 5:149, Malachi Moore, Safety. Dallas offered another trade: 149 for 174,204 and 211
Rd 5:153, Jack Nelson, OT Wisconsin (Best player on the board)
Rd 5:155, Nick Nash, WR San Jose St (More of a take a flyer type guy at that point)
Rd 7:217 dealt to Seattle for pick 223 and I chose Tyler Batty from BYU
There you have it, Thoughts?